I'm stuck. I'm debating what the actual
architectural intervention will be. I'm not sure if my studio project is entirely appropriate. It's a fairly radical design trying to resolve the issues of the site, and thus a large part of it is irrelevant to the thesis I'm presenting here. Either that, or because it is an example of a project that was appropriated for the production of additional value, may in fact be the most relevant example.
Part 1. The identity crisis of the European historic city• the identity of the contemporary historic city is in crisis
• the Post-Fordist restructuring of the economic sphere, and European Union integration has accelerated economic processes of commerce and exchange, instigating and escalating transnational flows of labour and capital
• these temporal and social processes unfettered by the free market environment of neoliberalism materialize at the level of the city in spatial permanences and social institutions
• in the face of failing industries and declining birth rates, global flows such as tourism and immigration are a necessity to the historic city, and yet these global flows disrupt the authenticity of the location and culture
• the conflict is as thus as such: The market has dictated an urban identity defined by difference, that is untenable to its state engineered identity
• the internal contradictions of this process cleave authenticity from the historic city, reducing urban development to the fabrication of an image and marginalization of elements that threaten this image, a process that does not reflect the true cultural and social identity of the contemporary historic city
• [Insert research about Asiatic and African migrant flow into the Mediterranean area, and Rome’s immigrations statistics]
Part 2. The paradigms of vision• the relocation of manufacturing sectors in the 1970s from, developed to developing regions have shifted the Keynesian-Fordist economy in the transformative powers of state planning to a Post-Fordist economy based on the fluidity of market processes
• therefore there has been a global shift in ownership models from public and private in the Post-Fordist era, or the era of neoliberalism
• this current era of neoliberalism relies on the combined acceleration of production and consumption in order to maintain economic equilibrium
• accelerated consumption is manufactured through a parallel image market in order to match accelerated production
• imagery and commodity fetishism has thus penetrated the societal psyche to such an extent that as Debord observes: capital accumulates to image, and image mediate relations, roles and values between people
• thus giving rise to what is variously called: media society, the society of spectacle, consumer society, the bureaucratic society of controlled consumption, or postindustrial society
• contemporary geopolitics, based on relations between countries and markets, is waged through large-scale complicity fabricated by these paradigms of vision
• the collective image is thus manipulated by the state to inform collective opinions, collective identities, with the prime tool often being the major media: the most egregious example of which is Berlusconi`s manipulation of Italy`s media sector and public space
• (Insert research about Italy`s Grandi Stazioni project in 2003, that shifted stations from public to private ownership models, hopefully other information to other spaces)
• The minaret ban in Switzerland, the veil ban in France, and the policing of public space in Italy are symptoms of this conflict between state-engineered images versus the urbanism of difference created by free market forces
• architects and architecture is complicit in this visual fabrication
• the commodification of architecture has lead to the gradual irrelevance of the profession, reducing architects to enablers of larger power structures
• In this way architecture like graffiti or pornography, `bears an obscenity...the architectural drawing can support specific meanings that the everyday experience of the actual building prevents...`( Tschumi, 12)
• Urban public space are charged spaces that are engineered to fabricate an image and identity of the city
• architectural interventions in this highly regulated, market-oriented realm has usually been limited to inserting state-friendly spectacle that fuels urban inequality and inauthenticity
• Example: Termini Train station, Trastevere, Vatican, Navona
Part 3. The Production of Added Value through Image Disruption• Urban public space are charged spaces that are engineered to fabricate an image and identity of the city
• architectural interventions in this highly regulated, market-oriented realm has usually been limited to inserting state-friendly spectacle that fuels urban inequality and inauthenticity
• How can architecture go beyond fulfilling requirements of project to create built environments that can address legitimate social and cultural identity of the city.
• architecture interventions have an opportunity to disrupt the visual complicity of conventional urban processes by portraying “the complexities of urban reality and socio-cultural and economic characters of urbanised nations”
• creating in opposition what Stefano Boeri has called, ‘geopolitics of multiple identities’
• Architecture deals with image of city, and thus exists in tension with memory, identity and opinion of the city
Part 4. Termini Train Station Intervnetion• ???